How is Sola Scriptura incoherent?

Nuda scriptura is scripture alone. Sola scriptura looks at the writings and the traditions, with the writings (source of the traditions) having greater relevance.

For example, Jesus has a God …

A Trinity was first mentioned as G-d, His Word and His Wisdom, by Theophilus of Antioch.

Is the water safe to drink in England like here in America or is it necessary to bring tablets to prevent any cholera when in London?

Later, Tertullian would lay the foundations of the Trinity.

John 20:17] Jesus said to her, “Do not cling to Me, for I have not yet ascended to My Father; but go to My brethren and say to them, ‘I am ascending to My Father and your Father, and to My God and your God.’ ”

But it was not until the efforts to create a uniform Christianity at Nicaea that the concept became the accepted tradition, to create a universal (catholic) interpretation of the writings.

Its year 2041, and president Hunter Biden has ordered every republican who sweared at him to be arrested and shot. I am on my way to the death row listening to the cheer of the Liberal mob chanting death death death. How can I escape?

Considering that the traditions stem from interpretations based off the writings, sola scriptura would be the means to test the coherency of the traditions.

So, how does that affect the Athanasian Christian doctrine of the Trinity?

The New Testament identifies Jesus. Literally, spelling it out in Acts 3.

Which is a better option, a love marriage or an arranged marriage in India?

But if you read it through the filter of the traditions of a Trinity, you will miss it (like many miss Jesus telling Mary about Mary’s G-d being Jesus’s G-d). That is incoherent.

How is Sola Scriptura incoherent?

Read also: